Reward shaping is an effective technique for incorporating domain knowledge into reinforcement learning (RL). Existing approaches such as potential-based reward shaping normally make full use of a given shaping reward function. However, since the transformation of human knowledge into numeric reward values is often imperfect due to reasons such as human cognitive bias, completely utilizing the shaping reward function may fail to improve the performance of RL algorithms. In this paper, we consider the problem of adaptively utilizing a given shaping reward function. We formulate the utilization of shaping rewards as a bi-level optimization problem, where the lower level is to optimize policy using the shaping rewards and the upper level is to optimize a parameterized shaping weight function for true reward maximization. We formally derive the gradient of the expected true reward with respect to the shaping weight function parameters and accordingly propose three learning algorithms based on different assumptions. Experiments in sparse-reward cartpole and MuJoCo environments show that our algorithms can fully exploit beneficial shaping rewards, and meanwhile ignore unbeneficial shaping rewards or even transform them into beneficial ones.

We study the problem of reward shaping to accelerate the training process of a reinforcement learning agent.

A reward function plays the central role during the learning/training process of a reinforcement learning (RL) agent. Given a "task" the agent is expected to perform (i.e., the desired learning outcome), there are typically many different reward specifications under which an optimal policy

Reinforcement learning (RL) has successfully automated the complex process of mining formulaic alpha factors, for creating interpretable and profitable investment strategies. However, existing methods are hampered by the sparse rewards given the underlying Markov Decision Process. This inefficiency limits the exploration of the vast symbolic search space and destabilizes the training process. To address this, Trajectory-level Reward Shaping (TLRS), a novel reward shaping method, is proposed. TLRS provides dense, intermediate rewards by measuring the subsequence-level similarity between partially generated expressions and a set of expert-designed formulas. Furthermore, a reward centering mechanism is introduced to reduce training variance. Extensive experiments on six major Chinese and U.S. stock indices show that TLRS significantly improves the predictive power of mined factors, boosting the Rank Information Coefficient by 9.29% over existing potential-based shaping algorithms. Notably, TLRS achieves a major leap in computational efficiency by reducing its time complexity with respect to the feature dimension from linear to constant, which is a significant improvement over distance-based baselines.

Potential-based reward shaping is commonly used to incorporate prior knowledge of how to solve the task into reinforcement learning because it can formally guarantee policy invariance. As such, the optimal policy and the ordering of policies by their returns are not altered by potential-based reward shaping. In this work, we highlight the dependence of effective potential-based reward shaping on the initial Q-values and external rewards, which determine the agent's ability to exploit the shaping rewards to guide its exploration and achieve increased sample efficiency. We formally derive how a simple linear shift of the potential function can be used to improve the effectiveness of reward shaping without changing the encoded preferences in the potential function, and without having to adjust the initial Q-values, which can be challenging and undesirable in deep reinforcement learning. We show the theoretical limitations of continuous potential functions for correctly assigning positive and negative reward shaping values. We verify our theoretical findings empirically on Gridworld domains with sparse and uninformative reward functions, as well as on the Cart Pole and Mountain Car environments, where we demonstrate the application of our results in deep reinforcement learning.

This paper proposes a method to learn shaping rewards in RL to improve learning. The authors clearly explain the problem and their method. The experimental results show clearly their method working as intended. I would expect the authors to update the final draft of their manuscript with the additional experiments provided in the author response and referencing and discussing the relation of their method to crucial pieces of prior work suggested by reviewers, in particular "Human-level performance in 3D multiplayer games with population-based reinforcement learning" which also performs bi-level optimisation of shaping rewards.

In reinforcement learning, especially in sparse-reward domains, many environment steps are required to observe reward information. In order to increase the frequency of such observations, "potential-based reward shaping" (PBRS) has been proposed as a method of providing a more dense reward signal while leaving the optimal policy invariant. However, the required "potential function" must be carefully designed with task-dependent knowledge to not deter training performance. In this work, we propose a "bootstrapped" method of reward shaping, termed BSRS, in which the agent's current estimate of the state-value function acts as the potential function for PBRS. We provide convergence proofs for the tabular setting, give insights into training dynamics for deep RL, and show that the proposed method improves training speed in the Atari suite.